From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ledesma-Araiza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
2:11-cr-313 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-cr-313 GEB

10-06-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA aka Sergio Ledesma, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Benjamin Galloway for JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424
Federal Defender
BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar #214897
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

TIME: 9:00 a.m.

JUDGE: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for October 7, 2011 be continued to November 4, 2011, at 8:30 a.m..

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for November 4, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(8)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Benjamin Galloway for

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is continued to November 4, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. for Further Status Conference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, the period from the date of this order up to and including November 4, 2011, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to ongoing preparation of counsel, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Ledesma-Araiza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
2:11-cr-313 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Ledesma-Araiza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA aka Sergio…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

2:11-cr-313 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)