Opinion
No. CR-S-10-443 JAM
08-01-2011
JOHN R. MANNING Attorney for Defendant Vi A. Le DOUGLAS J. BEEVERS Attorney for Defendant Tony Sek Mun OLAF W. HEDBERG Attorney for Defendant Dong Ping Huang
JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)
ATTORNEY AT LAW
Attorney for Defendant
VI A. LE
Judge: Honorable John A. Mendez
IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Todd D. Leras, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Vi A. Le, John R. Manning, Esq., counsel for defendant Tony Sek Mun, Douglas J. Beevers, Esq., and counsel for defendant Dong Ping Huang, Olaf W. Hedberg, Esq., that the status conference presently set for August 2, 2011 be continued to August 30, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., thus vacating the presently set status conference.
Defense counsel requires additional time to review the voluminous discovery and perform investigation. Therefore, counsel for the parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendants and the public in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) (continuity of counsel/ reasonable time for effective preparation) and Local Code T4, and agree to exclude time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the status conference, August 30, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
JOHN R. MANNING
Attorney for Defendant
Vi A. Le
DOUGLAS J. BEEVERS
Attorney for Defendant
Tony Sek Mun
OLAF W. HEDBERG
Attorney for Defendant
Dong Ping Huang
Benjamin B. Wagner
United States Attorney
TODD D. LERAS
Assistant U.S. Attorney
JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)
ATTORNEY AT LAW
1111 H Street, # 204
Sacramento, CA. 95814
(916) 444-3994
Fax (916) 447-0931
Attorney for Defendant
VI A. LE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
VI A. LE, et al., Defendants.
No. CR-S-10-0443 JAM
ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERNCE
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the August 2, 2011 status conference be continued to August 30, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. I find that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendant's need for continuity of counsel and reasonable time for effective preparation exceeds the public interest in a trial within 70 days. THEREFORE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and Local Code T4 from the date of this order to August 30, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge