From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Layton

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jul 27, 2021
Mag . 21-5023 (LHG) (D.N.J. Jul. 27, 2021)

Opinion

Mag . 21-5023 (LHG)

07-27-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICHOLAS LAYTON,

MICHELLE S. GASPARIAN ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS BRIAN P. REILLY, ESQ. COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT, NICHOLAS LAYTON


MICHELLE S. GASPARIAN ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS

BRIAN P. REILLY, ESQ. COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT, NICHOLAS LAYTON

ORDER FOR A CONTINUANCE

HON. DOUGLAS E. ARPERT JUDGE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Rachael A. Honig, Acting United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by Michelle S. Gasparian, Assistant United States Attorney), and defendant Nicholas Layton, (by Brian P. Reilly, Esq.), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter from the date this Order is signed through October 24, 2021 to permit defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation in this matter and to allow the parties to discuss the matter and conduct plea negotiations in an effort to resolve the case before grand jury proceedings and trial; and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter submitted to a grand jury within 30 days of the date of his arrest pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b); and no prior continuances having been entered; and the defendant, through his attorney, having consented to the continuance; and for good and sufficient cause shown, IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The parties anticipate exchanging discovery and entering into plea negotiations, which would render any grand jury proceedings and any subsequent trial of this matter unnecessary;

(2) The failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant or the attorney for the government the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence;

(3) The defendant has consented to the aforementioned continuance;

(4) The grant of a continuance will likely conserve judicial resources; and

(5) Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

WHEREFORE, it is on this 27th day of July, 2021;

ORDERED that this action be, and it hereby is, continued from the date this Order is signed through October 24, 2021; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from the date this Order is signed through October 24, 2021 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.


Summaries of

United States v. Layton

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jul 27, 2021
Mag . 21-5023 (LHG) (D.N.J. Jul. 27, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Layton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICHOLAS LAYTON,

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jul 27, 2021

Citations

Mag . 21-5023 (LHG) (D.N.J. Jul. 27, 2021)