From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lawrence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Nov 14, 2019
Case No. 1:19-cr-62-HSM-SKL-4 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 1:19-cr-62-HSM-SKL-4

11-14-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TANNER LAWRENCE


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), I conducted a plea hearing in this case on November 5, 2019. At the hearing, defendant moved to withdraw his not guilty plea to Count One and Count Two of the two-count Superseding Indictment and entered a plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing Methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B) and to Count Two in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement [Doc. 60]. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find the defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; the plea is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

Therefore, I RECOMMEND defendant's motion to withdraw his not guilty plea to Count One and Count Two of the Superseding Indictment be granted, his plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One of the Superseding Indictment, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing Methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B) and to Count Two in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement be accepted, the Court adjudicate defendant guilty of the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One of the Superseding Indictment, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing Methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B) and to Count Two in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement, and a decision on whether to accept the plea agreement be deferred until sentencing. Defendant's conditions of release were revoked. I further RECOMMEND defendant remain in custody until sentencing in this matter. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge.

/s/_________

SUSAN K. LEE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

You have the right to de novo review of the foregoing findings by the district judge. Any application for review must be in writing, must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to, and must be filed and served no later than fourteen days after the plea hearing. Failure to file objections within fourteen days constitutes a waiver of any further right to challenge the plea of guilty in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b).


Summaries of

United States v. Lawrence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Nov 14, 2019
Case No. 1:19-cr-62-HSM-SKL-4 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TANNER LAWRENCE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Nov 14, 2019

Citations

Case No. 1:19-cr-62-HSM-SKL-4 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2019)