From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Laredo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 14, 2011
No. 2:10-CR-299 EJG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-CR-299 EJG

10-14-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAREDO, et al Defendant.

Toni Carbone for MICHAEL E. HANSEN Attorney for Defendant BERNARDO LAREDO Toni Carbone for DAVID FISCHER Attorney for Defendant FRANCISCO PULIDO Toni Carbone for DAVID FISCHER Attorney for Defendant FRANCISCO PULIDO Toni Carbone for DANNY D. BRACE, JR. Attorney for Defendant BRENDA DESHIELDS Toni Carbone for DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant MARA STILES Toni Carbone for TOM JOHNSON Attorney for Defendant CHARLES DAVIES Toni Carbone for WILLIAM BONHAM Attorney for Defendant SCOTT PETERSON TONI CARBONE Attorney for Defendant ANGELA BOSCHKE Toni Carbone for DANIEL McCONKIE Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


TONI H. CARBONE (SBN 210119)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorney for Defendant

ANGELA BOSCHKE

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE


Judge: Hon.

The parties hereby stipulate the following:

1. Status Conference in this matter is presently set for October 14, 2011. Counsel for the above-referenced defendants and counsel for the Government request that the date for status be continued to December 2, 2011. The above-referenced defendants are set to be arraigned on a second superseding indictment on October 28, 2011. Our joint request is to continue the case for a status conference subsequent to the arraignment date. This continuance is requested to allow counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.
2. Counsel for the parties agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (continuity of counsel/ reasonable time for effective preparation, specifically the parties are working towards a resolution) and Local Code T4 (time for defense counsel to prepare), and agree to exclude time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the status conference, December 2, 2011 .
3. The parties agree to continue the status conference to December 2, 2011.

Respectfully submitted,

Toni Carbone for

MICHAEL E. HANSEN

Attorney for Defendant

BERNARDO LAREDO

Toni Carbone for

DAVID FISCHER

Attorney for Defendant

FRANCISCO PULIDO

Toni Carbone for

DAVID FISCHER

Attorney for Defendant

FRANCISCO PULIDO

Toni Carbone for

DANNY D. BRACE, JR.

Attorney for Defendant

BRENDA DESHIELDS

Toni Carbone for

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

MARA STILES

Toni Carbone for

TOM JOHNSON

Attorney for Defendant

CHARLES DAVIES

Toni Carbone for

WILLIAM BONHAM

Attorney for Defendant

SCOTT PETERSON

TONI CARBONE

Attorney for Defendant

ANGELA BOSCHKE

Toni Carbone for

DANIEL McCONKIE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the date for the status conference of the above-named defendants be continued from October 14, 2011 to December 2, 2011. It is further ordered that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (continuity of counsel/ reasonable time for effective preparation, specifically the parties are working towards a resolution) and Local Code T4, and that time is excluded time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the status conference, December 2, 2011 .

Edward J. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Laredo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 14, 2011
No. 2:10-CR-299 EJG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Laredo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAREDO, et al Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-CR-299 EJG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)