From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lantz

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 2, 2024
CRIM. 24-mj-01037 (D.N.J. May. 2, 2024)

Opinion

CRIM. 24-mj-01037

05-02-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AARON LANTZ


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TEIECONFERENCING

HONORABLE ANDREA D. BERGMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds: [✔] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[✔] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.
[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Lantz

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 2, 2024
CRIM. 24-mj-01037 (D.N.J. May. 2, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Lantz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AARON LANTZ

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: May 2, 2024

Citations

CRIM. 24-mj-01037 (D.N.J. May. 2, 2024)