Opinion
2:19-CR-327-GMN-VCF
04-28-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACQUES LANIER, Defendant.
SGRO & ROGER Alanna C. Bondy, Esq. ANTHONY P. SGRO, ESQ. ALANNA C. BONDY, ESQ. Attorneys for Jacques Lanier UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE BIANCA PUCCI, ESQ. Attorney for the United States of America CHRISTOPHER ORAM LAW OFFICE CHRISTOPHER ORAM, ESQ. Attorney for Jacques Lanier
SGRO & ROGER Alanna C. Bondy, Esq. ANTHONY P. SGRO, ESQ. ALANNA C. BONDY, ESQ. Attorneys for Jacques Lanier
UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE BIANCA PUCCI, ESQ. Attorney for the United States of America
CHRISTOPHER ORAM LAW OFFICE CHRISTOPHER ORAM, ESQ. Attorney for Jacques Lanier
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S (Second) MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER RESTRICTING DEFENDANT'S TELEPHONE AND MAILING PRIVILEGES [ECF NO. 240]
Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by JACQUES LANIER, by and through his attorneys, ANTHONY P. SGRO, ESQ., ALANNA C. BONDY, ESQ., CHRISTOPHER R. ORAM, ESQ., and the United States of America, by and through BIANCA R. PUCCI, ESQ., Assistant United States Attorney, that the deadline to file Defendant's Reply to the Government's Response to Defendant's (Second) Motion to Modify Order Restricting Defendant's Telephone and Mailing Privileges [ECF No. 240], which is currently due on April 28, 2023, be extended to May 2, 2023.
The stipulation is entered for the following reasons:
1. Defense Counsel needs to consult with Mr. Lanier in order to adequately respond to the allegations contained in the Government's Response to Defendant's (Second) Motion to Modify Order Restricting Defendant's Telephone and Mailing Privileges.
2. To date, Defense counsel has been unable to communicate with Mr. Lanier regarding the allegations contained in the Government's Response to Defendant's (Second) Motion to Modify Order Restricting Defendant's Telephone and Mailing Privileges.
3. The parties agree to extension.
4. The additional time requested herein is sought in good faith and not sought for purposes of delay.
5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's Reply to the Government's Response to Defendant's (Second) Motion to Modify Order Restricting Defendant's Telephone and Mailing Privileges [ECF No. 240] must be filed on or before May 2, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.