From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lane

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 9, 2013
2:13-CR-00239-JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)

Opinion

          J. TONY SERRA, SBN 32639, San Francisco CA, Attorney for Defendant, JOHN LANE.

          MICHAEL D. McCOY, Assistant U.S. Attorney, KALI S. GRECH, Attorney for KELSEY LANE.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to continue the hearing presently set for the date and time indicated above, to November 19, 2013, at 9:45 a.m., or another date and time convenient to the court and all parties, based on the following:

         1. Counsel for Mr. Lane has contacted all involved parties, and has determined that all parties are generally in agreement that this matter should be continued, for further status.

         2. Accordingly, the parties mutually request that the above date be vacated and that the matter be continued to 9:45 a.m. on November 19, 2013.

         3. The parties stipulate that the time is excludable from the time limitations of the Speedy Trial Act because the interests of justice are served by granting a continuance. This continuance, requested by the parties, will permit continuity of counsel, and allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. sections 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(iv).

         THE PARTIES THEREFORE STIPULATE that the hearing be continued from September 10, 2013 at 9:45 a.m., to November 19, 2013, at 9:45 a.m. with time continuing to be excluded as specified above, such that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

          ORDER

         Good cause appearing, and based upon the stipulation of the parties,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing in this matter is continued to November 19, 2013, at the hour of 9:45 a.m., and that time is excluded as stipulated.


Summaries of

United States v. Lane

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 9, 2013
2:13-CR-00239-JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN LANE and KELSEY LANE…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 9, 2013

Citations

2:13-CR-00239-JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)