From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Landgraf

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 15, 2022
2:21-CR-264-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CR-264-RFB-NJK

01-15-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA LANDGRAF, Defendant.

OSVALDO E. FUMO, ESQ. PITARO & FUMO CHTD. Attorney for Defendant MELISSA LANDGRAF SIMON KUNG, AUSA Assistant United States Attorney


(FIRST REQUEST)

OSVALDO E. FUMO, ESQ. PITARO & FUMO CHTD. Attorney for Defendant MELISSA LANDGRAF

SIMON KUNG, AUSA Assistant United States Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between SIMON KUNG, ESQ., Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and OSVALDO E. FUMO, ESQ., counsel for MELISSA LANDGRAF, that the Sentencing Hearing currently scheduled for January 18, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and reset or a date and time convenient to the court, but not earlier than 90 days.

1. Counsel for defendant has spoken to defendant and she has no objection to the request of continuance.
2. Defendant is out of custody and out on pretrial release.
3. Counsel has spoken to AUSA Simon Kung and he does not oppose to the continuance.
1
4. Counsel needs additional time to prepare for sentencing and to go over defendants issues and concerns.
5. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage justice.
6. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the Sentencing Hearing until a date and time convenient to the court.

This is the 1st request for continuance filed herein. 2

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Counsel for defendant has spoken to defendant and she has no objection to the request of continuance.
2. Defendant is out of custody and out on pretrial release.
3. Counsel has spoken to AUSA Simon Kung and he does not oppose to the continuance.
4. Counsel needs additional time to prepare for sentencing and to go over defendants issues and concerns.
5. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage justice.
6. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the Sentencing Hearing until a date and time convenient to the court.
3

This is the 1st request for continuance filed herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Denial of this request for continuance would deny the parties herein the opportunity to effectively and thoroughly prepare for Sentencing Hearing.

Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Sentencing Hearing currently scheduled for January 18, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to the 26th day of April at 9:00 AM in courtroom 7C. 4


Summaries of

United States v. Landgraf

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 15, 2022
2:21-CR-264-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 15, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Landgraf

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA LANDGRAF, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 15, 2022

Citations

2:21-CR-264-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 15, 2022)