From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lagunas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Colorado
Sep 14, 2012
Case No: 05-cr-00067-WYD-01 (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 05-cr-00067-WYD-01 USM No: 33262-013

09-14-2012

United States of America v. SIMON JOSE LAGUNAS

Joseph Saint-Veltri, Appointed Defendant's Attorney


Date of Previous Judgment: December 29, 2005

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)

Joseph Saint-Veltri, Appointed

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of X the defendant [ ] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [ ] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

X DENIED. [ ] GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of ____ months is reduced to ____ I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 31 Amended Offense Level: 25

Criminal History Category: I Criminal History Category: I

Previous Guideline Range: 120 to 135 months Amended Guideline Term: 120 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

[ ] The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. [ ] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. [ ] Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated December 29, 2005, shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: ____________

(if different from order date)

Wiley Y. Daniel

Judge's signature

Wiley Y. Daniel, Chief United States District Judge

Printed name and title


Summaries of

United States v. Lagunas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Colorado
Sep 14, 2012
Case No: 05-cr-00067-WYD-01 (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Lagunas

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. SIMON JOSE LAGUNAS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Colorado

Date published: Sep 14, 2012

Citations

Case No: 05-cr-00067-WYD-01 (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2012)