From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. La Cruz-Torrez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
No. 2:10-cr-00107-MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cr-00107-MCE

10-13-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALFONSO DE LA CRUZ-TORREZ, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant ALFONSO DE LA CRUZ-TORREZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Benjamin Galloway for MICHELE BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bart# 89424

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bart# 214897

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Defendant

ALFONSO DE LA CRUZ-TORREZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER

JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England Jr.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through MICHELE BECKWITH, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant ALFONSO DE LA CRUZ-TORREZ, by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Thursday, October 13, 2011, be continued to Thursday, November 10, 2011, at 9:00 a.m..

The reason for this continuance is that this case presents a Sentencing Guideline issue that is identical to one this Court is currently considering in United States v. Guadalupe Carrillo-Hernandez, 09-00462-MCE. It is anticipated that the Court will decide this issue at the Judgment and Sentencing hearing in that matter set November 3, 2011. The parties have conferred and agree that the ends of justice will be best served by deferring resolution of this case until the Court rules on the Guideline issue. The parties anticipate that this matter will then resolve. The parties believe that the requested continuance is the most efficient and effective manner of resolving this case in that it avoids the filing of duplicate motions. Finally, the parties will use the time between now and November 10, 2011 to prepare the case taking into account due diligence.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for November 10, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

DATED: October 4, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

ALFONSO DE LA CRUZ-TORREZ

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Benjamin Galloway for

MICHELE BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. It is hereby ordered that the presently set October 13, 2011 status conference and revocation hearing shall be continued to November 10, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.. It is further ordered that the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 4, 2011, through and including the date of the new status conference, November 10, 2011, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. La Cruz-Torrez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
No. 2:10-cr-00107-MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. La Cruz-Torrez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALFONSO DE LA CRUZ-TORREZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cr-00107-MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)