From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kuykendall

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Sep 1, 2021
2:21-CR-030 JD (N.D. Ind. Sep. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CR-030 JD

09-01-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAELYNN JANET KUYKENDALL


ORDER

Jon E. Deguilio, United States Chief Judge

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on August 17, 2021 [DE 21]. Accordingly, the Court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Raelynn Janet Keykendall's plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment, for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6).

Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should the Addendum to the Final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Kuykendall

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Sep 1, 2021
2:21-CR-030 JD (N.D. Ind. Sep. 1, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Kuykendall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAELYNN JANET KUYKENDALL

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Sep 1, 2021

Citations

2:21-CR-030 JD (N.D. Ind. Sep. 1, 2021)