From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Krute

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2011
Civil 2:10-CV-03241-KJM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. STANLEY R. KRUTE, COLETTE GELINAS COWLES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, SISKIYOU COUNTY, Defendants. Civil No. 2:10-CV-03241-KJM-CMK United States District Court, E.D. California. February 1, 2011

          ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT STANLEY R. KRUTE TO RESPOND TO UNITED STATES' COMPLAINT

          KIMBERLY MUELLER, District Judge.

         Based upon the parties' stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that the STIPULATION FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT STANLEY R. KRUTE'S TIME TO RESPOND TO UNITED STATES COMPLAINT is GRANTED and Stanley R. Krute shall have up to, and including, March 2, 2011, within which to file a response to the Complaint.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Krute

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2011
Civil 2:10-CV-03241-KJM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Krute

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. STANLEY R. KRUTE, COLETTE GELINAS…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2011

Citations

Civil 2:10-CV-03241-KJM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)