From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Krinitt

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 14, 2007
SA 07-247M (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2007)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PERRY KRINITT, Defendant. No. SA 07-247M United States District Court, C.D. California. September 14, 2007

          ORDER OF DETENTION [Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. §3143(a)].

          ARTHUR NAKAZATO, Magistrate Judge.

         The defendant having been arrested in this judicial district pursuant to a warrant issued by the Honorable Howard D. McKibben, United States District Judge, of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, for an alleged violation of the terms and conditions of the defendant's supervised release; and

         The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a). The Court finds that:

         A. (X) The defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on the nature of the charged offense, the defendant's lack of adequate bail resources; unemployed status; use of numerous name variations; lack of candor with Pretrial Services and his fiance; defendant's extensive criminal history, which includes numerous fraud and theft-related offenses; the defendant's personal history of being a financial predator and scam artist as set forth in the Presentencing Report; and the nature of the charge offense, which includes his failure to report a recent arrest for resisting a peace officer and providing false financial information to the Probation Office; and

         B. (X) The defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on the nature of the charged offense and his extensive criminal history.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending the further revocation proceedings in the charging district.


Summaries of

United States v. Krinitt

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 14, 2007
SA 07-247M (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2007)
Case details for

United States v. Krinitt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PERRY KRINITT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 14, 2007

Citations

SA 07-247M (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2007)