From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kreitzer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 26, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cr-133 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cr-133

03-26-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. DAVID KREITZER, Defendant.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

ENTRY SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO

SUPRESS AND MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. #10)

At the conclusion of the oral and evidentiary hearing on the Defendant's motion to suppress evidence and motion in limine (Doc. #10), the following briefing schedule was discussed and agreed upon. Thirty (30) days after the filing of the transcript of the aforesaid oral and evidentiary hearing, a transcript that was filed March 25, 2013, counsel shall file simultaneous memoranda, to be followed fourteen (14) days thereafter by simultaneous reply memoranda.

________________________

WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Copies to: Counsel of record


Summaries of

United States v. Kreitzer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 26, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cr-133 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Kreitzer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. DAVID KREITZER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cr-133 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2013)