From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kohler

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 23, 2012
466 F. App'x 670 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-50456 D.C. No. 8:07-cr-00024-AHS

01-23-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RENE BOUDEWIJN KOHLER, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Rene Boudewijn Kohler appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Kohler's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Kohler with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Kohler

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 23, 2012
466 F. App'x 670 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Kohler

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RENE BOUDEWIJN KOHLER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

466 F. App'x 670 (9th Cir. 2012)