From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Nov 22, 2013
No.: 3:11-CR-80-4-TAV-CCS (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2013)

Opinion

No.: 3:11-CR-80-4-TAV-CCS

11-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARY ANN KNIPP, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the defendant's pro se motion to expedite transit/designation to facility [Doc. 124]. Defendant pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute oxycodone [Doc. 75] and was sentenced to 40 months imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release [Doc. 109]. Defendant is asking the Court for an order expediting her transfer to the Bureau of Prisons facility for service of her sentence.

The Bureau of Prisons has the express authority to designate the place of a prisoner's confinement. 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b); Devonshire v. Holder, 2013 WL 460532 at *2 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 6, 2013). Moreover, it is well-settled that federal prisoners have no constitutional right to be confined in, or transferred to, a particular facility. Id., see also McKune v. Live, 536 U.S. 24, 39 (2002); Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (1983); Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215 (1976). Therefore, the Court finds that it is without authority to expedite Defendant's transfer to the Bureau of Prisons facility. Accordingly, Defendant's motion to expedite transit/designation [Doc. 124] is DENIED.

ENTER:

Thomas A. Varlan

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Nov 22, 2013
No.: 3:11-CR-80-4-TAV-CCS (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Knipp

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARY ANN KNIPP, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Nov 22, 2013

Citations

No.: 3:11-CR-80-4-TAV-CCS (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2013)