United States v. Knight

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DOUGLAS JAMES KNIGHT…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 18, 2006

No. 06-30140 (9th Cir. Sep. 18, 2006)

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DOUGLAS JAMES KNIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. No. 06-30140 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit September 18, 2006

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted September 11, 2006 ^**

** This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CR-04-00002-CCL

Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^*

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Douglas James Knight appeals from the district court§s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 9-month term of imprisonment. Knight was originally convicted of possession of stolen firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Knight has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Knight has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel§s motion to withdraw, and AFFIRM the district court§s judgment.