From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kline

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Oct 22, 2020
CR206-12-BU-DLC (D. Mont. Oct. 22, 2020)

Opinion

CR206-12-BU-DLC

10-22-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN PATRICK KLINE, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and has entered a plea of guilty to one count of receipt of a firearm and ammunition with the intent to commit a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(b) as set forth in the Superseding Information. Defendant further agrees to the forfeiture allegation in the Superseding Information.

After examining the Defendant under oath, I have made the following determinations:

1. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed and voluntary plea to the criminal offense charged against him, and an informed and voluntary admission to the allegation of forfeiture;

2. That the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of pleading guilty to the charge;

3. That the Defendant understands the allegation of forfeiture and the consequences of admitting to the allegation;

4. That the Defendant fully understands his constitutional rights, and the extent to which he is waiving those rights by pleading guilty to the criminal offense charged against him, and admitting to the allegation of forfeiture;

5. That both his plea of guilty to the criminal offense charged against him and his admission to the allegation of forfeiture are knowingly and voluntarily entered, and are both supported by independent factual grounds sufficient to prove each of the essential elements of the criminal offense charged and the legal basis for the forfeiture.

The Court further concludes that the Defendant had adequate time to review the Plea Agreement with counsel, that he fully understands each and every provision of the agreement and that all of the statements in the Plea Agreement are true. Therefore, I recommend that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the Superseding Information, and that sentence be imposed. I further recommend the agreed forfeiture be imposed against Defendant.

This report is forwarded with the recommendation that the Court defer a decision regarding acceptance until the Court has reviewed the Plea Agreement and the presentence report .

DATED this 22nd day of October, 2020.

/s/_________

Kathleen L. DeSoto

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Kline

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Oct 22, 2020
CR206-12-BU-DLC (D. Mont. Oct. 22, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Kline

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN PATRICK KLINE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 22, 2020

Citations

CR206-12-BU-DLC (D. Mont. Oct. 22, 2020)