From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Klar

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 26, 2006
164 F. App'x 622 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Argued and Submitted August 1, 2005.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Page 623.

Andrew C. Friedman, Esq., USSE--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Broberg, Esq., Law Office of William Broberg, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Jack E. Tanner, Senior Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-01-05769-JET.

Before: NOONAN, T.G. NELSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The sentencing transcript is unclear as to whether the district court granted or denied the government's motion for a downward departure for substantial assistance under U.S. S.G. § 5K1.1. Klar's sentence is hereby vacated and remanded so that the district court may clarify its sentencing ruling and the basis for its decision regarding the government's 5K1.1 motion for a downward sentencing departure. On remand, the district court may hold such hearings and enter such orders as it determines to be necessary, including, without limitation, modifying its previous sentence.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Klar

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 26, 2006
164 F. App'x 622 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Klar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Sean KLAR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

164 F. App'x 622 (9th Cir. 2006)