United States v. Klamath Drainage Dist.

Full title: United States of America Plaintiff, v. KLAMATH DRAINAGE DISTRICT…

Court: United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

1:22-cv-00962-CL (D. Or. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00962-CL

11-07-2022

United States of America Plaintiff, v. KLAMATH DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Defendant,

Timothy R. Pack (Utah Bar #12193) CLYDE SNOW & SESSIONS, PC Reagan L.B. Desmond, (OSB #045129) CLYDE SNOW & SESSIONS, PC Attorneys for Defendant Klamath Drainage District BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General RUTH A. HARVEY Director T. Dietrich Hill Attorneys for Plaintiff

Mark D. Clark United States Magistrate Judge

Timothy R. Pack (Utah Bar #12193) CLYDE SNOW & SESSIONS, PC

Reagan L.B. Desmond, (OSB #045129) CLYDE SNOW & SESSIONS, PC Attorneys for Defendant Klamath Drainage District

BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General RUTH A. HARVEY Director

T. Dietrich Hill Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER DISMISSING COUNTERCLAIMS AND STIPULATION TO AMEND ANSWER

Mark D. Clark United States Magistrate Judge

Based on the Parties' Stipulated Motion Dismissing Counterclaims and Stipulation to Amend Answer, and good cause appearing, Defendant Klamath Drainage District's (“KDD”) counterclaims are dismissed and Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaims Under Rule 12(b)(1) for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [Dkt. 17] is denied as moot. Further, based on the Parties' stipulation, KDD may file an amended answer on or before November 15, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Approved as to form: