From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kiyak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2012
No. 2:11-CR-0274 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CR-0274 JAM

07-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CEM KIYAK, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney TODD PICKLES Assistant U.S. Attorney DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Mr. Kiyak


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

CEM KIYAK

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDE TIME


Date: July 24, 2012

Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, Cem Kiyak, that the status conference scheduled for July 24, 2012, may be continued to September 11, 2012, at 9:45 a.m.

The defense is scheduled to review during August extensive paperwork seized by the government and held at Customs (the cost of photocopying or scanning the papers turned out to be prohibitive). Mr. Kiyak will assist with this review. The defense will then need additional time for follow-up investigation. Because it will take several weeks review and investigate, the parties ask to set the status off to September 11. The parties agree that the interests of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the parties in a speedy trial, so that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on September 11, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

_________________

TODD PICKLES

Assistant U.S. Attorney

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

_________________

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Mr. Kiyak

ORDER

The status conference is continued to September 11, 2012, at 9:45 a.m. Time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded through that date for the reasons stated above and by agreement of the parties, the Court finding that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial for the reasons stated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Kiyak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2012
No. 2:11-CR-0274 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Kiyak

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CEM KIYAK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 20, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-CR-0274 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)