From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kirsch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Dec 16, 2020
CR 20-44-M-DLC (D. Mont. Dec. 16, 2020)

Opinion

CR 20-44-M-DLC

12-16-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS PAUL KIRSCH, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court is United State Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto's Findings and Recommendation Concerning Plea. (Doc. 24.) Because neither party objected, they are not entitled to de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Therefore, the Court reviews the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnel Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).

Mr. Kirsch is charged with one count of prohibited person in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and one count of possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d), and 5871. (Doc. 1.) Based on Mr. Kirsch's appearance before Judge DeSoto, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, she recommends that this Court adjudge him guilty of one count of prohibited person in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), defer acceptance of the Plea Agreement (Doc. 19) until it has reviewed the agreement and the Presentence Investigation Report, and impose the agreed forfeiture against him. (Doc. 24 at 2.) Reviewing these recommendations for clear error, the Court finds none. As is the Court's practice, any decision regarding acceptance of the plea agreement and dismissal of Count II will be deferred until sentencing.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 24) IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Kirsch's motion to change plea (Doc. 15) is GRANTED, and he is adjudged guilty of one count of prohibited person in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d), Mr. Kirsch shall forfeit any firearms and ammunition involved and used in any knowing violation of the offense for which he has been adjudged guilty.

DATED this 16th day of December, 2020.

/s/_________

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Kirsch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Dec 16, 2020
CR 20-44-M-DLC (D. Mont. Dec. 16, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Kirsch

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS PAUL KIRSCH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

Date published: Dec 16, 2020

Citations

CR 20-44-M-DLC (D. Mont. Dec. 16, 2020)