From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kirkpatrick

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
2:15-CR-190-MCE (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

2:15-CR-190-MCE

08-31-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REMUS ALAN KIRKPATRICK, Defendant.

PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH TANYA B. SYED Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America


PHILLIP A. TALBERT

Acting United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH TANYA B. SYED

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America

ORDER GRANTING RULE 35 MOTION

MORRISON C. ENGLAND. JR SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Upon consideration of the United States's motion pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure filed on August 26, 2021 (ECF 742), and for the reasons set forth in the United States's motion, the Court GRANTS the United States's Rule 35 motion. The court's October 10, 2019 judgment (ECF 539) imposing a sentence of incarceration of seventy-two months shall be reduced by twelve months to a total term of sixty months. All other aspects of the original judgment shall remain in full force and effect. The hearing set for September 2, 2021, is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Kirkpatrick

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
2:15-CR-190-MCE (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Kirkpatrick

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REMUS ALAN KIRKPATRICK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

Citations

2:15-CR-190-MCE (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)