From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kim

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 1, 2022
No. CR-20-163-PRW (W.D. Okla. Aug. 1, 2022)

Opinion

CR-20-163-PRW

08-01-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD HYUNGJOON KIM, Defendant.


ORDER

PATRICK R. WYRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is the United States' Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Dkt. 53), seeking leave of Court to dismiss the Indictment (Dkt. 1) against Defendant Donald Hyungjoon Kim without prejudice. Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that prior to trial “[t]he government may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment” in a criminal case. “Requiring the government to obtain leave of the court to dismiss an indictment serves two purposes.” The principal purpose is “to protect a defendant against prosecutorial harassment, e.g., charging, dismissing, and recharging, when the Government moves to dismiss an indictment over the defendant's objection.”The secondary purpose is “to allow courts to consider public interest, fair administration of criminal justice and preservation of judicial integrity when evaluating motions to dismiss.” “A court is generally required to grant a prosecutor's Rule 48(a) motion to dismiss unless dismissal is clearly contrary to manifest public interest.”

United States v. Strayer, 846 F.2d 1262, 1265 (10th Cir. 1988).

Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U.S. 22, 29 n.15 (1977) (per curiam).

Strayer, 846 F.2d at 1265.

United States v. Carrigan, 778 F.2d 1454, 1463 (10th Cir. 1985)

The Court finds that protection of Mr. Kim from prosecutorial harassment is not an issue, as Mr. Kim has represented to the Court that he does not oppose the motion. And based on the intervening change in Supreme Court precedent and the Government's representations, the Court further finds that dismissal without prejudice is not clearly contrary to manifest public interest. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the United States' Motion (Dkt. 53) and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Indictment (Dkt. 1).

Cf. United States v. Romero, 360 F.3d 1248, 1251 (10th Cir. 2004).

In light of the dismissal of the Indictment, the Court also DENIES as moot the Defendant's Motion in Limine (Dkt. 50).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Kim

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 1, 2022
No. CR-20-163-PRW (W.D. Okla. Aug. 1, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Kim

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD HYUNGJOON KIM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 1, 2022

Citations

No. CR-20-163-PRW (W.D. Okla. Aug. 1, 2022)

Citing Cases

United States v. Noel

Noel references cases in this Circuit and in others where the Government has either dropped similar charges…