From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Khan

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 7, 2021
21 Cr. 313 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2021)

Opinion

21 Cr. 313 (JPO)

12-07-2021

United States v. Niaz Khan, et al.

MOSES & SINGER LLP


MOSES & SINGER LLP

ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, JUDGE

Dear Judge Oetken:

I write on behalf of the parties, jointly requesting that the status conference presently scheduled for Friday, December 10th, 2021 be adjourned 30-days, to a date and time convenient to the Court.

We make this request because the defendants require additional time to review discovery and discuss pretrial dispositions with the government.

Accordingly, all defendants consent to the exclusion of time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, from December 10th 2021, through the date to which the conference is adjourned.

The Court's consideration is greatly appreciated.

Granted. Respectfully,

The December 10, 2021 pretrial conference is adjourned to January 18, 2022 at 2:30 pm. The Court hereby excludes time Barrv Zone through January 18, 2022, under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(A), finding that the ends of justice outweigh the Bgr Zone interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

So ordered. 1


Summaries of

United States v. Khan

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 7, 2021
21 Cr. 313 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Khan

Case Details

Full title:United States v. Niaz Khan, et al.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

21 Cr. 313 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2021)