From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kesterson

U.S.
Dec 9, 1935
296 U.S. 299 (1935)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 46.

Submitted November 14, 1935. Decided December 9, 1935.

Decided upon the authority of United States v. Constantine, ante, p. 287. 76 F.2d 913, affirmed.

CERTIORARI to review a judgment reversing convictions of respondents for carrying on a liquor business contrary to state law without having paid the tax imposed by § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926.

Mr. Gordon Dean, with whom Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Keenan and Messrs. Mahlon D. Kiefer and W. Marvin Smith were on the brief, submitted for the United States.

Mr. Frank Hickman submitted for respondents.


This case, like the case next preceding, involves the validity of § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed judgments of conviction under an indictment charging engaging in the business of a retail liquor dealer contrary to the laws of Oklahoma on August 17, 1934. 8 F. Supp. 680; 76 F.2d 913.

For the reasons given in the opinion in the other case the judgment is

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS, MR. JUSTICE STONE and MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO'S opinion in United States v. Constantine, ante, p. 287.


Summaries of

United States v. Kesterson

U.S.
Dec 9, 1935
296 U.S. 299 (1935)
Case details for

United States v. Kesterson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v . KESTERSON ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 9, 1935

Citations

296 U.S. 299 (1935)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ianniello

363 U.S. 370, 389, 80 S.Ct. 1171, 1182, 4 L.Ed.2d 1277 (1960) (Congress can forbid conduct through mailing…