From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kenner

United States District Court, District of Montana
Apr 6, 2023
CR 22-127-BLG-DLC (D. Mont. Apr. 6, 2023)

Opinion

CR 22-127-BLG-DLC

04-06-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY OMAREL KENNER, Defendant.


ORDER

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Anthony Omarel Kenner's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Trial and Set Scheduling Conference. (Doc. 23.) The motion states that the current trial date of July 17, 2023 conflicts with Mr. Kenner's counsel's schedule because he is set to try a case in state court commencing the same day. (Id. at 1-2.) The motion requests that the Court vacate the current trial date and hold a short telephonic scheduling conference to select the new trial date. (Id. at 2.) The United States does not object. (Id.)

Although the stated scheduling conflict provides sufficient reason to continue the trial to allow Mr. Kenner continuity of counsel, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), a telephonic scheduling conference is unnecessary. The Court will deny the motion to vacate the trial setting, subject to renewal upon a motion to continue that provides trial dates acceptable to both parties.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 23) is DENIED, subject to renewal.


Summaries of

United States v. Kenner

United States District Court, District of Montana
Apr 6, 2023
CR 22-127-BLG-DLC (D. Mont. Apr. 6, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Kenner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY OMAREL KENNER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Apr 6, 2023

Citations

CR 22-127-BLG-DLC (D. Mont. Apr. 6, 2023)