From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kennedy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 20, 2021
Case No. 18-20315 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 18-20315

04-20-2021

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Keith Kennedy (D-3), Defendant.


Elizabeth A. Stafford Magistrate Judge ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT KEITH KENNEDY'S MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE [138]

Before the Court is Defendant's request for compassionate release from FCI Morgantown due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. (ECF No. 138.) For the following reasons, Defendant's motion is DENIED.

Background

On September 4, 2020, the Court sentenced Defendant to 36 months' imprisonment after he pled guilty to one count of Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 846. (ECF No. 114.)

On April 6, 2021, Defendant moved for compassionate release and/or reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), arguing that the danger posed to him by the COVID-19 pandemic due to his obesity, hypertension, thyroid issues, COPD, sleep apnea, hepatitis c, and borderline diabetes constitutes an "extraordinary and compelling reason" for release. (ECF No. 138, PageID.797) The United States responded in opposition to the motion April 16, 2021. (ECF No. 143.) In addition to their legal filing, the United States provided a copy of Defendant's vaccine consent form indicating that, after being provided a copy of the COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization Fact Sheet, Defendant declined to receive the first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine on April 2, 2021. (ECF No. 143-3, PageID.930.) Accordingly, Defendant apparently declined the vaccine and then requested compassionate release through the courts approximately four days later. Neither Defendant, in his motion, nor the declined consent form, indicates the reason for his refusal. (See id.)

Analysis

Compassionate-release motions require a "three-step" inquiry:

First, the Court must "find that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant a sentence reduction";
Second, the Court must "ensure that such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission"; and

Finally, the Court must "consider all relevant sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)."
United States v. Elias, 984 F.3d 516, 518 (6th Cir. 2021). "If each of these requirements are met, the district court may reduce the term of imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)." Id.

The Court denies Defendant's motion for compassionate release because his access to the COVID-19 vaccine mitigates the concern about extraordinary and compelling medical conditions that might otherwise compel release. Courts in this circuit have consistently refused to find extraordinary and compelling medical circumstances when a defendant declines the COVID-19 vaccine. See, e.g., United States v. Goston, No. 15-20694 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2021) (Levy, J.); United States v. Macgregor, No. 15-20093 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 12, 2021) (Leitman, J.); United States v. Ervin, No. 14-000195 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 5, 2021) (Richardson, J.). Additionally, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advise that the Pfizer vaccine is 95% effective at preventing COVID-19 in individuals who have not previously contracted COVID-19, and "[e]fficacy [i]s similarly high in a secondary analysis including participants [with] evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection." The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Interim Recommendation for Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine—United States, December 2020, Centers for Disease Control (Jan. 28, 2021) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6950e2.htm?s_cid=mm6950e2_w.

Because there are no extraordinary and compelling reasons for release, the Court need not consider the remaining compassionate release factors at this time. See Elias, 984 F.3d at 518.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2021
Ann Arbor, Michigan

s/Judith E. Levy

JUDITH E. LEVY

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on April 20, 2021.

s/William Barkholz

WILLIAM BARKHOLZ

Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. Kennedy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 20, 2021
Case No. 18-20315 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Kennedy

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Keith Kennedy (D-3), Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 20, 2021

Citations

Case No. 18-20315 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2021)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mayberry

But the fact that he could choose to take the vaccine—and thus decrease his risk of infection to a huge…

United States v. Cruz

Several courts refused to find extraordinary and compelling medical circumstances when a defendant declines…