From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kaur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
1:12-cr-0 0169-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-cr-0 0169-LJO-SKO

07-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHARANJIT KAUR, and BALJIT SINGH, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GRANT B. RABENN Assistant U.S. Attorney YAN SHRAYBERMAN Attorney for Defendant Baljit Singh


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

GRANT B. RABENN

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

Attorneys for the

United States of America

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE

ORDER BETWEEN THE UNITED

STATES AND DEFENDANT BALJIT SINGH

WHEREAS, the discovery in this case is voluminous and contains a large amount of personal and confidential information including but not limited to bank account information, personal identifiers and other personal information of victims-customers and the defendants ("Protected Information"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to avoid both the necessity of large scale redactions and the unauthorized disclosure or dissemination of this information to anyone not a party to the court proceedings in this matter;

The parties agree that entry of a stipulated protective order is appropriate.

THEREFORE, Defendant Baljit Singh, by and through counsel of record ("Defense Counsel"), and the United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Grant B. Rabenn, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. This Court may enter a protective order pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and its general supervisory authority.

2. This Order pertains to all discovery provided to or made available to Defense Counsel as part of discovery in this case (hereafter, collectively known as "the discovery").

3. By signing this Stipulation and Protective Order, Defense Counsel agrees not to share any documents that contain Protected Information with anyone other than Defense Counsel attorneys, designated defense investigators, and support staff. Defense Counsel may permit Defendant to view unredacted documents in the presence of his attorney, defense investigators, and support staff. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff shall not allow Defendant to copy Protected Information contained in the discovery. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff may provide Defendant with copies of documents from which Protected Information has been redacted.

4. The discovery and information therein may be used only in connection with the litigation of this case and for no other purpose. The discovery is now and will forever remain the property of the United States of America ("Government"). Defense Counsel will return the discovery to the Government or certify that it has been shredded at the conclusion of the case.

5. Defense Counsel will store the discovery in a secure place and will use reasonable care to ensure that it is not disclosed to third persons in violation of this agreement.

6. Defense Counsel shall be responsible for advising the Defendant, employees, and other members of the defense team, and defense witnesses of the contents of this Stipulation and Order.

7. In the event that Defendant substitutes counsel, undersigned Defense Counsel agrees to withhold discovery from new counsel unless and until substituted counsel agrees also to be bound by this Order.

8. Defense Counsel reserves the right to later seek to have the terms of this Order modified or revoked. Defense Counsel agrees to return the discovery to the Government in its complete form if the terms of this Order are modified or revoked if so requested by the United States.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _________________

GRANT B. RABENN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

By: _________________

YAN SHRAYBERMAN

Attorney for Defendant

Baljit Singh
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Kaur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
1:12-cr-0 0169-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Kaur

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHARANJIT KAUR, and BALJIT SINGH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Citations

1:12-cr-0 0169-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)