From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Karganilla

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Apr 26, 2010
CV 10-1749 SC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2010)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and AVA POINTER, Revenue Officer, Petitioners, v. RODERICK G. KARGANILLA, Respondent. No. CV 10-1749 SC. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division. April 26, 2010.

          ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS

          SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

         Good cause having been shown by the petitioner upon its petition filed in the above-entitled proceeding on April 23, 2010, it is hereby:

         ORDERED that respondent Roderick G. Karganilla appear before this Court on the 6th day of August, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 1, 17th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, California, and then and there show cause, if any, why respondent should not be compelled to appear and provide documents and testimony as required by the summons heretofore served upon respondent as alleged and set forth in particular in said petition; and it is further

         ORDERED that a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with a copy of the aforesaid petition, be served upon said respondent in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure at least thirty-five (35) days before the return date of this Order above specified; and it is further:

         ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days before the return date of this Order, respondent may file and serve a written response to the petition, supported by appropriate affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, as well as any motion respondent desires to make, that the petitioner may file and serve a written reply to such response, if any, within fourteen (14) days before the return date of this Order; that all motions and issues raised by the pleadings will be considered on the return date of this Order, and only those issues raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit(s) or declaration(s) will be considered at the return of this Order, and any uncontested allegation in the petition will be considered admitted.


Summaries of

United States v. Karganilla

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Apr 26, 2010
CV 10-1749 SC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2010)
Case details for

United States v. Karganilla

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and AVA POINTER, Revenue Officer, Petitioners, v…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Apr 26, 2010

Citations

CV 10-1749 SC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2010)