From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kale

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 26, 2022
2:22-MJ-105-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-MJ-105-VCF

04-26-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN CHRISTOPHER KALE, Defendant.

MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANT KEVIN CHISTOPHER KALE JOSHUA BRISTER ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANT KEVIN CHISTOPHER KALE

JOSHUA BRISTER ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION

2ND REQUEST

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ., Counsel for Defendant KEVIN CHRISTOPHER KALE and JOSHUA BRISTER, Assistant United States Attorney, that Preliminary Examination currently scheduled for April 29, 2022 at 4:00 p.m., be vacated and reset to a date and time convenient to the court but no earlier than sixty (60) days.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel has spoken to Defendant and he has no objection to the request for continuance.
2. Defendant is currently out on pretrial release.
3. Counsel for defendant has spoken to AUSA and he has no objection to the continuance.
4. Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the case.
5. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d) provides that a magistrate judge may extend the time limits in Rule 5.1(c) with the defendant's consent and upon a showing of good cause taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. Because the defendant requires time to adequately review the case prior to the preliminary hearing, good cause exists to extend the time limits in Rule 5.1(c).
6. The time from February 24, 2022, to the new preliminary hearing date will be excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), which provides that the Court may exclude time arising from a continuance upon finding that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial.
7. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage justice.
8. The additional time requested by this stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the indictment must be filed pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b), and considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(i) and (iv).
9. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the Preliminary Examination until a date and time convenient to the court.

This is the second request for continuance filed herein.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds:

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel has spoken to Defendant and he has no objection to the request for continuance.
2. Defendant is currently out on pretrial release.
3. Counsel for defendant has spoken to AUSA and he has no objection to the continuance.
4. Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the case.
5. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage justice.
6. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the Preliminary Examination until a date and time convenient to the court.

This is the second request for continuance filed herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Denial of this request for continuance would deny the parties herein the opportunity to effectively and thoroughly prepare for Preliminary Examination.

Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of Justice.

The additional time requested by this stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the indictment must be filed pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b), and considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(i) and (iv).

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Preliminary Examination currently scheduled for April 29, 2022, at 4:00 p.m., be continued to the 6th day of July, 2022 at 4:00 p.m., in courtroom 3D.


Summaries of

United States v. Kale

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 26, 2022
2:22-MJ-105-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Kale

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN CHRISTOPHER KALE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 26, 2022

Citations

2:22-MJ-105-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2022)