From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 6, 2021
2:19-cv-0559 JAM KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-0559 JAM KJN

12-06-2021

UNITED STATES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF MARYLAND, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF WASHINGTON ex rel. JEFFREY MAZIK, Plaintiffs, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, INC., and THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUPS, Defendants.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California Vincent DiCarlo Supervising Deputy Attorney General KEVIN C. DAVIS, State Bar No. 253425 Deputy Attorney General, Attorneys for State of California.


Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California Vincent DiCarlo Supervising Deputy Attorney General KEVIN C. DAVIS, State Bar No. 253425 Deputy Attorney General, Attorneys for State of California.

ORDER ON THE PLAINTIFF STATES' NOTICE OF ELECTION TO DECLINE INTERVENTION AS TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

ORDER

Since Plaintiffs California, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington (collectively, the "Plaintiff States") have declined to intervene in this action pursuant to their respective false claims acts (e.g. Cal. Gov't Code § 12652(c)(6)(B)), the Court rules as follows

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The First Amended Complaint be unsealed and served upon the defendants by the relator;

2. All other contents of the Court's file in this action shall remain under seal and not be made public or served upon the defendants, except for filings already unsealed by order of the Court;

3. The parties shall serve all pleadings and motions filed in this action, including supporting memoranda, upon the Plaintiff States as provided for in Cal. Gov't Code § 12652(f)(1) and the other states' respective false claims acts (excluding Maryland). The Plaintiff States (other than Maryland) may order any deposition transcripts and are entitled to intervene in this action as provided in their respective false claims acts at any time; and

4. The parties shall serve all notices of appeal on the Plaintiff States;

5. All orders of this Court shall be served on the Plaintiff States; and that

6. Should the relator or the defendants propose that this action be dismissed, settled, or otherwise discontinued, the Court will provide the Plaintiff States (other than Maryland) with notice and an opportunity to be heard before ruling or granting its approval, in accordance with Cal. Gov't Code § 12652(c)(1) and the respective false claims acts of the Plaintiff States.

7. In accordance with the terms of the Maryland False Health Claims Act, Md. Code Ann., Health Gen, § 2-604 (a)(7), the State of Maryland having declined to intervene in this matter, all claims asserted on behalf of Maryland are hereby dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 6, 2021
2:19-cv-0559 JAM KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF GEORGIA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 6, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-0559 JAM KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)