From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Juncaj

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 1, 2023
2:22-cr-00008-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cr-00008-JCM-EJY

02-01-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GJERGI LUKE JUNCAJ, Defendant.

RENE L. VALLADARES, Federal Public Defender, Nevada State Bar No. 11479, NAVID AFSHAR, Assistant Federal Public Defender, REBECCA LEVY, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Attorney for Gjergi Luke Juncaj. JASON M. FRIERSON, United States Attorney, JONATHAN E. JACOBSON LAUREN CASTALDI Trial Attorneys Public Integrity Section.


RENE L. VALLADARES, Federal Public Defender, Nevada State Bar No. 11479, NAVID AFSHAR, Assistant Federal Public Defender, REBECCA LEVY, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Attorney for Gjergi Luke Juncaj.

JASON M. FRIERSON, United States Attorney, JONATHAN E. JACOBSON LAUREN CASTALDI Trial Attorneys Public Integrity Section.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF NO. 69] (FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Jonathan E. Jacobson, Trial Attorney, Public Integrity Section, and Lauren Castaldi, Trial Attorney, Public Integrity Section, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Navid Afshar and Rebecca Levy, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, counsel for Gjergi Luke Juncaj, that the defendant's response deadline to the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 69) currently due February 14, 2023, be vacated and extended to February 21, 2023.

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for defense will be out of jurisdiction or otherwise unavailable between 2/9/23 and 2/14/23.

2. The defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to the extension.

3. The parties agree to the extension of the response.

4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for the defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively litigate the issues at hand and continue in an effort to resolve the case.

5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

This is the first stipulation to extend this responsive pleading deadline.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Counsel for defense will be out of jurisdiction or otherwise unavailable between 2/9/23 and 2/14/23.

2. The defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to the extension.

3. The parties agree to the extension of the response.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The extension sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section § 3161 (h)(7)(A), when the considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant's response deadline to the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 69) currently due February 14, 2023, be vacated and extended to February 21, 2023.


Summaries of

United States v. Juncaj

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 1, 2023
2:22-cr-00008-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Juncaj

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GJERGI LUKE JUNCAJ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 1, 2023

Citations

2:22-cr-00008-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2023)