From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Joyner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2013
505 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7525

01-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WAYNE EDWARD JOYNER, Defendant - Appellant.

Wayne Edward Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, District Judge. (1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2) Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Edward Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wayne Edward Joyner appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Joyner, No. 1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2012). We also deny Joyner's motions to appoint counsel and to place the appeal in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Joyner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2013
505 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Joyner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WAYNE EDWARD JOYNER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

505 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Michigan State University

Plaintiff has offered no similar evidence regarding the Defendants' conduct. See Dorr v. City of Ecorse, No.…