From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jordan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Aug 27, 2012
C.R. No. 2:07-924 (D.S.C. Aug. 27, 2012)

Opinion

C.R. No. 2:07-924

08-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. BERNARD JORDAN, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendant's pro se motion for a reduction of sentence, filed in this court on July 25, 2012. Defendant seeks a reduction of his sentence based on an Amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, namely Amendment 750.

This Amendment reduces the Guidelines range for those sentences involving cocaine base or "crack" cocaine. Defendant was sentenced based upon his status as a career offender. Therefore, defendant's Guidelines sentencing range, adopted by this court at sentencing, is unaffected by this Amendment.

Defendant's motion is, therefore, DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

David C. Norton

United States District Judge
August 27, 2012
Charleston, South Carolina


Summaries of

United States v. Jordan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Aug 27, 2012
C.R. No. 2:07-924 (D.S.C. Aug. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. BERNARD JORDAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Aug 27, 2012

Citations

C.R. No. 2:07-924 (D.S.C. Aug. 27, 2012)