Opinion
21-30090
09-16-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAWAN DEONTE JONES, Defendant-Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00023-SPW-1
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.MEMORANDUM [*]
Dawan Deonte Jones appeals from the district court's judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 6-month custodial sentence and 51-month term of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jones's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Jones has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
Jones's pro se request to terminate his supervised release is denied without prejudice to renewal in the district court at the appropriate time. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1).
Within 7 days of this disposition, appellee must serve the disposition on appellant individually and provide the court with proof of service, including appellant's mailing address.
AFFIRMED.
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.