From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jones

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 11, 2013
CR.S. 12-0113-MCE (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion

          DENNIS S. WAKS, BAR #142581 Attorney at Law, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Defendant ZACHARY M. JONES

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, /s/Dennis S. Waks for MATTHEW G. MORRIS, Assistant U.S. Attorney


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.

         It is hereby stipulated and agreed to by the United States of America through MATTHEW G. MORRIS, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant, ZACHARY M. JONES, by and though his counsel, DENNIS S. WAKS, that the status conference set for December 12, 2013, be continued to a status conference on Thursday, February 6, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. This continuance is being requested because defense counsel needs additional time to prepare, to review discovery, and to interview witnesses. The defendant has received a large amount of discovery; in response, the defendant has supplied the Government with an extensive Mitigation Memo and an offer. Furthermore, Mr. Morris was in a Jury Trial which started on October 21, 2013, in front of Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, and it lasted over 4 weeks.

         Lastly, the parties stipulate and agree that the interest of justice served by granting this continuance outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. (18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A)). Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for February 6, 2014, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

          ORDER

         Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the date of the stipulation through and including February 6, 2014, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4. A new status conference date is hereby set for February 6, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Jones

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 11, 2013
CR.S. 12-0113-MCE (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ZACHARY M. JONES Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

CR.S. 12-0113-MCE (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)