From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
CR S 11-111 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CR S 11-111 MCE

09-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JERRY JONES, et al Defendants

Todd Leras Assistant U.S. Attorney J Toney Attorney for Jerry Jones


J. Toney

Attorney at Law

Attorney for Jerry Jones

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Oct. 27, 2011 before Judge England

This matter is now set for Status Conference on Sept. 29 2011. Because the parties need more time to complete the plea negotiations, the parties STIPULATE the present date be vacated and the case continued until Oct. 27, 2011 and request the Court so order. The parties stipulate that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded for Counsel preparation; 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(A), local code T4.

Todd Leras

Assistant U.S. Attorney

J Toney

Attorney for Jerry Jones

IT IS SO ORDERED; the Court also finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
CR S 11-111 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JERRY JONES, et al Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

CR S 11-111 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)