From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-CR-300 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-CR-300 AWI

01-18-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDRE JOHNSON Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney ELANA S. LANDAU Assistant United States Attorney ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI Attorney for Defendant Johnson


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

ELANA S. LANDAU

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING


JUDGE: Hon.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the status conference in the above-captioned matter now set for January 23, 2012, may be continued to January 30, 2012 at 9:00 A.M. This continuance is at the request of both counsel for to allow time for proper preparation and to permit plea negotiations between the parties with the intention of conserving time and resources for both parties and the court. This is only the second status hearing, and a plea offer went out on January 13, 2012. Defense counsel has requested additional time to review the offer with Mr. Johnson. The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and continuing plea negotiations pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _________

ELANA S. LANDAU

Assistant United States Attorney

By: _________

ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI

Attorney for Defendant Johnson

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-CR-300 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDRE JOHNSON Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-CR-300 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)