From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of New York
Oct 31, 2011
Case No: 01-CR-6017L (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: 01-CR-6017L USM No: 10723-055

10-31-2011

United States of America v. ALFRED JOHNSON

MaryBeth Covert, AFPD Defendant 's


Date of Previous Judgment or Last Sentencing Reduction March 29, 2005

(Use Date of Last Order of the Court)

MaryBeth Covert, AFPD

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of X the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[] DENIED. X GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment or sentencing reduction issued) of 180 months is reduced to TIME SERVED .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 35 Amended Offense Level: 29

Criminal History Category: VI Criminal History Category: VI

Previous Guideline Range: 292 to 365 months Amended Guideline Range: 240 to 240 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

[] The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

[] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

x Other (explain): Original sentence was below Guidelines because of Government 5K1.1 motion. A comparable reduction is warranted under Guidelines effective 11/1/11. See Guidelines § 1B 1.10(b)(2)(B).

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated 3/29/05 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Judge's signature

Effective Date: November 1, 2011

(if different from order date)

David G. Larimer - United States District Judge

Printed name and title


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of New York
Oct 31, 2011
Case No: 01-CR-6017L (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. ALFRED JOHNSON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of New York

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

Case No: 01-CR-6017L (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2011)