From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 25, 2013
No. 13-7228 (4th Cir. Oct. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7228

10-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRUCE LEE JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; William E. Day II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; William E. Day II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lee Johnson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2 (D.S.C. July 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 25, 2013
No. 13-7228 (4th Cir. Oct. 25, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRUCE LEE JOHNSON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 25, 2013

Citations

No. 13-7228 (4th Cir. Oct. 25, 2013)