From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Nov 8, 2024
CR-24-05610-001-TUC-JCH (BGM) (D. Ariz. Nov. 8, 2024)

Opinion

CR-24-05610-001-TUC-JCH (BGM)

11-08-2024

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Darius Lee Johnson, Defendant.


ORDER

Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald United States Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is the Government's November 8, 2024 Henthorn Memorandum requesting that the Court conduct an in camera review of information received from the United States Customs and Border Protection. The information concerns a Border Patrol agent who may be called to testify at a November 25, 2024 suppression hearing in this case. According to the memorandum, the agent was arrested on March 15, 2022, for “extreme DUI,” and during the agent's arrest, he stated that he was a Border Patrol agent. The agent received a twenty-one day suspension for conduct unbecoming of an agent and misuse of position. The Government requests that the Court determine whether this information needs to be disclosed to defense counsel.

The Court has conducted an in camera review of the memorandum under United States v. Henthorn, 931 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1991). Henthorn dictates that the prosecution has a duty to examine the personnel files of testifying law enforcement officers and to disclose information in the files “that is or may be material to the defendant's case.” 931 F.2d at 31. Material information includes “evidence that might tend to impeach a government witness,” United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900, 903 (9th Cir. 2009), and information that “could cast doubt upon their credibility,” United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488, 1490 (9th Cir. 1992). See also Milke v. Ryan, 711 F.3d 998, 1006 (requiring disclosure of a testifying officer's personnel file that documented a five-day suspension for dishonest conduct). The information contained in the Government's memorandum is material, and the Government is instructed to disclose the information to the defense.

IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the Government's Henthorn Memorandum UNDER SEAL on the case docket.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the Government shall disclose the Henthorn information to Defendant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the Government and Defendant shall receive a copy of this Order.


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Nov 8, 2024
CR-24-05610-001-TUC-JCH (BGM) (D. Ariz. Nov. 8, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Darius Lee Johnson, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Nov 8, 2024

Citations

CR-24-05610-001-TUC-JCH (BGM) (D. Ariz. Nov. 8, 2024)