From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

United States District Court, District of Idaho
Dec 5, 2023
1:23-CR-00177-AKB-3 (D. Idaho Dec. 5, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-CR-00177-AKB-3

12-05-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JENIKA ANN JOHNSON Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DEBORA K. GRASHAM, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 5, 2023, Defendant JENIKA ANN JOHNSON appeared before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge to enter a change of plea pursuant to a written plea agreement. (Dkt. 137). The Defendant executed a waiver of the right to have the presiding United States District Judge take her change of plea. Thereafter, the Court explained to the Defendant the nature of the charges contained in the Indictment, the maximum penalties applicable, her Constitutional rights, the impact that the Sentencing Guidelines will have, and that the District Judge will not be bound by the agreement of the parties as to the penalty to be imposed.

The Court, having conducted the change of plea hearing and having inquired of the Defendant, counsel, and the government, finds there is a factual basis for the Defendant's guilty plea, that she entered it voluntarily and with full knowledge of the consequences, and that the plea should be accepted. The undersigned also ordered a presentence investigation to be conducted and a report prepared by the United States Probation Office.

RECOMMENDATION

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED:

1) The District Court accept Defendant JENIKA ANN JOHNSON'S plea of guilty to Count FIVE of the Indictment.

2) The District Court order forfeiture consistent with Defendant JENIKA ANN JOHNSON'S admission to the Criminal Forfeiture allegation in the Indictment and the Plea Agreement (Dkt. 137).

3) The District Court GRANT, at the appropriate time, the United States' motion to dismiss Count ONE of the Indictment as to Defendant JENIKA ANN JOHNSON.

Written objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen (14) days pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.1(b), or as a result of failing to do so, that party may waive the right to raise factual and/or legal objections to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

United States District Court, District of Idaho
Dec 5, 2023
1:23-CR-00177-AKB-3 (D. Idaho Dec. 5, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JENIKA ANN JOHNSON Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Idaho

Date published: Dec 5, 2023

Citations

1:23-CR-00177-AKB-3 (D. Idaho Dec. 5, 2023)