Opinion
22-6782
10-18-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEPHAN ANTONIO JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Stephan Antonio Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Coull Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: October 13, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-cr-00334-BO-7)
Stephan Antonio Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Sharon Coull Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Stephan Antonio Johnson appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Johnson's motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (per curiam) (stating standard), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. United States v. Johnson, No. 5:20-cr-00334-BO-7 (E.D. N.C. May 18, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED