Opinion
21-6853
12-22-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYRONE ANTHONY JOHNSON, a/k/a Tyrone A. Johnson, Defendant-Appellant.
John M. McKenna, BRENNAN MCKENNA &LAWLOR, CHTD., Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Jonathan F. Lenzner, Acting United States Attorney, Thomas M. Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: December 21, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:10-cr-00692-PWG-1)
John M. McKenna, BRENNAN MCKENNA &LAWLOR, CHTD., Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant.
Jonathan F. Lenzner, Acting United States Attorney, Thomas M. Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Tyrone Anthony Johnson appeals the district court's orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release and denying reconsideration. We review a district court's denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, No. 21-5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.