From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 19, 2006
163 F. App'x 604 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Andrew G. Brown, USLA--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James M. Crawford, Esq., Orange, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-00942-GAF-1.

Before: HUG, O'SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Donte Lamont Johnson appeals his 188-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We deny appellant's motion to vacate his sentence, as he has failed to demonstrate plain error. See id. at 1079.

All outstanding motions are denied as moot.

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 19, 2006
163 F. App'x 604 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Donte Lamont JOHNSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 19, 2006

Citations

163 F. App'x 604 (9th Cir. 2006)