From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Feb 17, 2021
No. 3:18-CR-005-KAC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3:18-CR-005-KAC-HBG

02-17-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WALTER JOHNSON, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

All pretrial motions in this case have been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) for disposition or report and recommendation regarding disposition by the District Court as may be appropriate. Now before the Court is Defendant's pro se Motion for Substitution of Counsel [Doc. 24], filed on February 1, 2021. The parties appeared before the Court via videoconference for a motion hearing on February 17, 2021. Assistant United States Attorney Alan Kirk represented the Government. Assistant Federal Defender Benjamin Sharp and the Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee ("FDSET") appeared on behalf of Defendant, who was also present. Attorney Donny Young was also present.

In his Motion for Substitution of Counsel [Doc. 24], Defendant requests new counsel due to a breakdown of communication and provides his opinion that the attorney-client relationship is irretrievably broken. During the motion hearing, Assistant Federal Defender Sharp detailed that it was his opinion that the attorney-client relationship was irretrievably broken. The Government stated that it did not object to the pending motion.

Based upon the representations of Assistant Federal Defender Sharp and Defendant during the hearing, the Court finds that the trust necessary for the attorney-client relationship is irretrievably broken and the ability to communicate is significantly eroded. Accordingly, the Court finds that good cause exists to grant the request for substitution of counsel. See Wilson v. Mintzes, 761 F.2d 275, 280 (6th Cir. 1985) (holding that a defendant seeking to substitute counsel must show good cause).

Therefore, Defendant's Motion for Substitution of Counsel [Doc. 24] is GRANTED, and Assistant Federal Defender Sharp and the FDSET are RELIEVED as counsel of record for Defendant. At the end of the hearing, Attorney Young agreed to accept representation of the Defendant if the present motion was granted. The Court therefore and hereby SUBSTITUTES and APPOINTS Attorney Young under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, as counsel of record for Defendant. Assistant Federal Defender Sharp and the FDSET are DIRECTED to turn over all discovery and the Defendant's file to Attorney Young. Additionally, the parties are DIRECTED to contact District Judge Crytzer's Chambers to reschedule Defendant's revocation hearing.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) Defendant's Motion for Substitution of Counsel [Doc. 24] is GRANTED;

(2) Assistant Federal Defender Sharp and the FDSET are RELIEVED of further representation of Defendant and are DIRECTED to provide new defense counsel with the discovery and information from Defendant's file as soon as possible; and

(3) Attorney Donny Young is SUBSTITUTED and APPOINTED as counsel of record for the Defendant pursuant to the CJA, and the parties are DIRECTED to contact District Judge Crytzer's Chambers to reschedule the revocation hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED

ENTER:

/s/_________

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Feb 17, 2021
No. 3:18-CR-005-KAC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WALTER JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Feb 17, 2021

Citations

No. 3:18-CR-005-KAC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2021)