From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
No. CR 10-360 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR 10-360 CRB

10-20-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WARREN JOHNSON, Defendant.

BARRY J. PORTMAN Federal Public Defender ELIZABETH M. FALK Assistant Federal Public Defender Counsel for Defendant JOHNSON


BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

ELIZABETH M. FALK

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Counsel for Defendant JOHNSON

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF

STATUS CONFERENCE

Court: The Honorable Joseph C. Spero

The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. This matter is set for a status conference on October 21, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.;
2. Counsel for Mr. Johnson is scheduled to be in trial on October 21, 2011 and can no longer make the status conference;
3. Counsel for the government has been contacted and has no objection to the continuation;
4. The defense thus requests that the status conference be continued to November 3, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ELIZABETH M. FALK

ASSISTANT FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

KIRSTIN AULT

ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, the change of plea hearing in the aforementioned matter is hereby CONTINUED from October 19 , 2011 to November 3, 2011 at 10:30 A.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
No. CR 10-360 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WARREN JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

No. CR 10-360 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)