From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. John J. Driscoll Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 20, 1964
330 F.2d 614 (4th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 9300.

Argued April 15, 1964.

Decided April 20, 1964.

Cross-appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Edward S. Northrop, District Judge.

William E. Brooke, District Heights, Md., for appellees and cross-appellants.

Alan Edgar Harris, Baltimore, Md., for appellants and cross-appellees.

Before BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, District Judge.


After consideration of the record, the briefs and arguments of counsel we are not persuaded either that the factual findings of the District Court are clearly erroneous or that its conclusions of law thereon are unsound. The mutual obligations of General Excavating Company and John J. Driscoll Company, Inc., appellants and cross-appellants, respectively rested in part upon a formal written agreement and in part upon supplementing parol understandings between them. However, the transactions were so loosely knit and conducted that they afforded ample opportunity for the entry of ambiguities. Indeed, these measurably increased the never easy task of the trier of fact to ascertain the intent of the contracting parties. The District Judge cautiously undertook this task and, on our review, we cannot say his determinations were not right.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. John J. Driscoll Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 20, 1964
330 F.2d 614 (4th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

United States v. John J. Driscoll Company

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America for the Use of Fred C. KNAUER and Thomas A…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 1964

Citations

330 F.2d 614 (4th Cir. 1964)